Thursday, 20 October 2011

The Constructivists


Constructivist Suprematism was an artistic phenomenon that changed the way people viewed and perceived art and its purpose in society, particularly in Russia around the very early 20th century.

Constructivists were artists, photographers, engineers, assemblers, sculptors, writers and philosophers. Their belief was that art should be expressive and organic, humanized and given life!

Constructivists such as Alexander Rodchenko aimed to produce work that directly engaged with its witness and encouraged that person to actively participate in the piece.

Often the pieces produces consisted less of realistic images and more geometric shapes, lines, curves and bold highly contrasting colours and shades.

The work of this era was utilized mainly for industrial campaign posters and propaganda flyers but also was greatly displayed through the use of photography and photomontage. Jagged lines and abstract lighting would ensure a feeling was conveyed before any direct link to an already established image could be defined. They key was to make art more ‘human’ more accessible and to inspire and engage the viewer directly.

One major influence during this movement was an artist called Alexander Rodchenko. Working primarily as a painter he moved into the realms of photomontage in order convey the feeling of motion on a 2d plain. He later went on to produce paintings that challenged the common aesthetic. Monochromatic works that “reduced painting to its logical conclusion”.


Kazimir Malevici: Suprematism 1916

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

The Futurists


I had a lecture today about a renegade group of new thinkers coined THE FUTURISTS !
who were they??
They were ready to abandon the past in light of technology, speed and progressive thought.
  1. We intend to sing the love of danger, the habit of energy and fearlessness.

  2. Courage, audacity, and revolt will be essential elements of our poetry.
http://www.unknown.nu/futurism/manifesto.html


Umberto Boccioni, 'Elasticity ' (1912)



The movement, founded by Filipo Tommaso Marinetti, centered on the future, speed, technology, modernity. A complete abandonment of tradition and the past, artistically, socially and politically. The futurists wanted change and separation from Italy's corrupt government.

Architects, designers, artists, engineers of this movement produced streamed lines and complex shapes, crisp, clean, superior, geometric, complicated and intimidating. A need to percieve motion and progression forward!

On the surface I'll admit, I was swept away by the futurists! The work produced was certainly awe inspiring and amazing. Forward thinking!? Down with Corruption?!? Beauty in progression?!? Were do i sign up? ....
Oh hang on a minute I am a woman with views, opinions and a fondness for peace and harmony? .... Bugger! Guess Im out ... The futurists were quite simply (and i mean really simplified, to one word, in my humble and uneducated, instinctive opinion) Anarchists.
A beautiful notion laced with violence, sexism and totalitarianism.
They did however create some impressive and awesome images depicting motion and fluidity, dynamic and intimidating. Swings and roundabouts i suppose !



Giacomo Balla
The Hand of the Violinist, 1912




Beautiful Losers

This was not my first watch of the film Beautiful Losers. I watched it whilst in hospital last year in a bid to attain some much needed artistic inspiration. My first watch left me feeling inspired to produce art that didn't necessarily have a meaning or purpose and that didn't necessarily have to be 'good' by any definition or opinion. It affirmed in me the need and desire to paint and create purely for the sake of doing. And I felt good about it! I was at the time becoming consumed with the 'What does my degree require' and the work i was churning out was god awful!
On my second watch... in a lecture theatre, i approached the film much more critically then the first time, I really listened and still inspired to paint, found myself slightly more enchanted by the group of artists encapsulated in the documentary, because it is clear years on and now successful, the art makers are still dedicated to their craft and their enjoyment and respect of it and their peers is so easily witnessed in their expressions, tones and lack of pretension. They are far more accessible and identifiable.
The film in essence centres around a collective of artists brought together by sharing an ideal, to create. To create what they wanted to see and to produce what made them happy, to deliver a message in their way and seemingly not worry about how that message is received/ perceived. Selfish art. and why not? I found it refreshing in an age were more and more frequently its the signature that sells the piece and gets it recognised and less about the piece itself. They seem to allow the work to speak for itself, lending a new meaning to whoever looks/watches/feels it.
I loved how each artist was inspired by their emotions and external influences, the finished piece was generally just that and there was no blurb or artists sentiment. No bullshit.
Alot of their work seemed renegade, Fluid, Organic.
Many would acuse them of being lazy, criminal, opinionated. All fair statements but so what, in expressing themselves they seemed to have ditched the pretence. Take it or leave it but here it is. I admire that.